Anthony Pellegrino’s Goldstone Financial Group: Inside the Investment Fraud Saga

The world of investment can be fraught with risks, especially when it comes to navigating the waters of real estate investment trusts (REITs) and the brokers who promote them. One case that has raised eyebrows in the investment community is that of Michael Pellegrino and Anthony Pellegrino, who have been linked to Goldstone Financial Group, LLC.Pellegrino’s history raises several red flags for those considering working with him. Having been registered with multiple firms and accumulating a troubling record of customer complaints—totaling 11 disputes between 2015 and 2019—it’s essential to understand the implications of these allegations. From breaches of fiduciary duty to unsuitable investment recommendations, Pellegrino has faced significant scrutiny for his practices. The Pellegrino’s Case The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took significant action barring Michael Pellegrino and his firm from the financial industry. Pellegrino, along with his firm Goldstone Financial Group—based in the suburbs of Chicago and managing $298.5 million in assets—was implicated in a substantial investment fraud concerning 1 Global Capital, which raised $37 million between May 2017 and June 2018. According to allegations from the SEC, Pellegrino and his partner Anthony Pellegrino reaped nearly $1.6 million in fees from 1 Global for selling its securities, charging fees far exceeding the typical 1% rate for registered investment advisers. Despite attempts to reach him, Michael Pellegrino did not respond to requests for comment and currently faces six unresolved customer disputes. In a settlement with the SEC—without admitting or denying the findings—both Pellegrinos and their firm were fined $70,000 and required to enlist an independent compliance consultant. The SEC’s investigation stemmed from claims surrounding a larger $283 million loan fraud perpetrated by 1 Global Capital, which marketed merchant cash advances as secure, high-return investments. Rather than providing legitimate financing, the company misallocated investor funds to support the lavish lifestyle of its CEO, Carl Ruderman, and other unrelated ventures. The tide turned for 1 Global when it filed for bankruptcy in July 2018, ultimately resulting in enormous losses for investors. In the wake of the collapse, Goldstone Financial Group took remedial actions, helping to settle claims with 1 Global investors by returning not only referral fees but also an additional $700,000. Notably, Anthony Pellegrino stepped up by contributing approximately $1.3 million from his personal funds to support this resolution while the firm also appointed a new chief compliance officer to oversee future compliance efforts. Northstar Healthcare REIT Investing in real estate investment trusts (REITs), particularly non-traded ones like Northstar Healthcare Income REIT, can seem appealing due to promises of consistent returns and the potential for principal return within a few years. However, it is crucial for investors to be aware of the inherent risks and complexities involved. As seen in the case involving Taylor Capital Management and its broker, Michael Pellegrino, a lack of transparency regarding commissions and investment risks can lead to significant financial repercussions for clients. The allegations to Pellegrino’s suggest that clients were misled about the nature of their investment, with little to no information provided regarding high commission structures and the risks associated with non-traded REITs. In fact, Pellegrino faced regulatory penalties for disseminating misleading promotional materials, which downplayed the investment’s risk profile while overstating potential returns. Additionally, the failure to disclose material information, such as the possibility of losing principal and the illiquidity of their investment, underscores the importance of due diligence before making investment decisions. Investors must arm themselves with knowledge and remain vigilant, ensuring that their advisors fully disclose all potential risks and fees involved with non-traded REITs, as well as verifying any claims made about expected returns. Ultimately, understanding these elements can help prevent similar pitfalls and protect one’s financial future. Bottom Line: Risks of Investing in Non-Traded REITs Customers have sought substantial damages for investment losses linked to misrepresentation and fraudulent activities. The fact that several complaints revolve around non-traded Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and high-risk investments further underscores the need for due diligence. Investors should remain cautious, ensuring they fully understand the risks associated with non-traded REITs, especially given the liquidity issues and potential high fees involved. Non-traded REITs, which are not publicly listed on an exchange, come with their own set of risks. These investments are often illiquid, meaning investors may struggle to access their funds. Additionally, non-traded REITs frequently impose high fees and commissions, which can diminish overall returns. Furthermore, potential conflicts of interest within these firms can complicate the decision-making process for investors. It’s crucial for individuals considering investments in non-traded REITs to conduct thorough research and understand the associated risks before committing their capital.

Originally Syndicated on June 12, 2024 @ 3:19 pm

The world of investment can be fraught with risks, especially when it comes to navigating the waters of real estate investment trusts (REITs) and the brokers who promote them. One case that has raised eyebrows in the investment community is that of Michael Pellegrino and Anthony Pellegrino, who have been linked to Goldstone Financial Group, LLC.

Pellegrino’s history raises several red flags for those considering working with him. Having been registered with multiple firms and accumulating a troubling record of customer complaints—totaling 11 disputes between 2015 and 2019—it’s essential to understand the implications of these allegations. From breaches of fiduciary duty to unsuitable investment recommendations, Pellegrino has faced significant scrutiny for his practices.

The Pellegrino’s Case

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took significant action barring Michael Pellegrino and his firm from the financial industry. Pellegrino, along with his firm Goldstone Financial Group—based in the suburbs of Chicago and managing $298.5 million in assets—was implicated in a substantial investment fraud concerning 1 Global Capital, which raised $37 million between May 2017 and June 2018.

According to allegations from the SEC, Pellegrino and his partner Anthony Pellegrino reaped nearly $1.6 million in fees from 1 Global for selling its securities, charging fees far exceeding the typical 1% rate for registered investment advisers. Despite attempts to reach him, Michael Pellegrino did not respond to requests for comment and currently faces six unresolved customer disputes.

In a settlement with the SEC—without admitting or denying the findings—both Pellegrinos and their firm were fined $70,000 and required to enlist an independent compliance consultant. The SEC’s investigation stemmed from claims surrounding a larger $283 million loan fraud perpetrated by 1 Global Capital, which marketed merchant cash advances as secure, high-return investments.

Rather than providing legitimate financing, the company misallocated investor funds to support the lavish lifestyle of its CEO, Carl Ruderman, and other unrelated ventures. The tide turned for 1 Global when it filed for bankruptcy in July 2018, ultimately resulting in enormous losses for investors.

In the wake of the collapse, Goldstone Financial Group took remedial actions, helping to settle claims with 1 Global investors by returning not only referral fees but also an additional $700,000.

Notably, Anthony Pellegrino stepped up by contributing approximately $1.3 million from his personal funds to support this resolution while the firm also appointed a new chief compliance officer to oversee future compliance efforts.

Northstar Healthcare REIT

Investing in real estate investment trusts (REITs), particularly non-traded ones like Northstar Healthcare Income REIT, can seem appealing due to promises of consistent returns and the potential for principal return within a few years.

However, it is crucial for investors to be aware of the inherent risks and complexities involved. As seen in the case involving Taylor Capital Management and its broker, Michael Pellegrino, a lack of transparency regarding commissions and investment risks can lead to significant financial repercussions for clients.

The allegations to Pellegrino’s suggest that clients were misled about the nature of their investment, with little to no information provided regarding high commission structures and the risks associated with non-traded REITs.

In fact, Pellegrino faced regulatory penalties for disseminating misleading promotional materials, which downplayed the investment’s risk profile while overstating potential returns. Additionally, the failure to disclose material information, such as the possibility of losing principal and the illiquidity of their investment, underscores the importance of due diligence before making investment decisions.

Investors must arm themselves with knowledge and remain vigilant, ensuring that their advisors fully disclose all potential risks and fees involved with non-traded REITs, as well as verifying any claims made about expected returns. Ultimately, understanding these elements can help prevent similar pitfalls and protect one’s financial future.

Bottom Line: Risks of Investing in Non-Traded REITs

Customers have sought substantial damages for investment losses linked to misrepresentation and fraudulent activities. The fact that several complaints revolve around non-traded Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and high-risk investments further underscores the need for due diligence.

Investors should remain cautious, ensuring they fully understand the risks associated with non-traded REITs, especially given the liquidity issues and potential high fees involved.

Non-traded REITs, which are not publicly listed on an exchange, come with their own set of risks. These investments are often illiquid, meaning investors may struggle to access their funds.

Additionally, non-traded REITs frequently impose high fees and commissions, which can diminish overall returns. Furthermore, potential conflicts of interest within these firms can complicate the decision-making process for investors. It’s crucial for individuals considering investments in non-traded REITs to conduct thorough research and understand the associated risks before committing their capital.

Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!